Skip to main content

One Land Acknowledgment Present, One Missing: Fatuous Virtue Signaling at McMaster University

This 2021 fall term, McMaster University and Tel Aviv University are jointly offering an online course, "The Beginning of Science: Ancient Egyptian and Babylonian Conceptions of Space and Time."  As is true of many courses at North American universities in 2021, the syllabus starts with a land acknowledgment.  And taken on its own, that land acknowledgment is serious and admirable.  It reads:

"We recognize and acknowledge that McMaster University meets and learns on the traditional territories of the Mississauga and Haudenosaunee nations, and within the lands protected by the 'Dish With One Spoon' wampum, an agreement amongst all allied Nations to peaceably share and care for the resources around the Great Lakes."

What is missing—and once one sees this, one cannot un-see it—is a comparable land acknowledgment for Tel Aviv University.  Something like this would be in order: "Tel Aviv University meets and learns on Palestinian land, which has been stolen and ethnically cleansed by the Zionist settler colonial project since the late 1890s, and especially by the Nakba of '48; the university is, moreover, complicit in the everyday apartheid of the Israeli state inside both '48 Palestine and '67 Palestine."

Given the welcome land acknowledgment in one case and the utter silence in the second, one must conclude that the course faculty (Drs. Sarah Symons of McMaster & Eshbal Ratzon of Tel Aviv) aren't actually serious about land acknowledgments.  What after all is the force of land acknowledgments if they are not offered with moral constancy—if they are absent when they are politically most inconvenient and controversial?

Put otherwise: acknowledging that McMaster operates on First Nations land, but—oops—saying nothing about Tel Aviv U's relationship to Palestine and Palestinians is a covering up, indeed a passive denial but a denial nonetheless, of the Nakba.  And as a proud Jew and a historian, let me say this: Nakba denialism—like Holocaust denialism—is intellectually fraudulent and ethically repulsive.  Not a good way to start a course; not a good way to start a new academic year.

Very admirably, however, two social justice student groups at McMaster—Solidarity for Palestinian Human Rights-McMaster (SPHR-McMaster) and McMaster Divest—are pushing back.  In accord with BDS principles, they are demanding a severing of the institutional relationship between McMaster and apartheid-complicit Tel Aviv U.  An important general point here is that virtual or online educational partnerships deserve our boycott as much as those that happen in person, such as study abroad programs at Israeli Universities.

As a faculty member firmly committed to academic freedom, I think it is also important to register that the demand to end this institutional partnership is not an objection to the course per se, nor does it limit the academic freedom of Drs. Symons and Ratzon to communicate and collaborate as individual scholars: the objection is specifically and explicitly to the institutional relationship. And too, we must keep in mind that Israeli universities are not sites of academic freedom, and are, fully to the contrary, deeply complicit in the Israeli state’s severe and pervasive violations of the right to education of Palestinians.  Put simply: academic boycotts of Israeli universities are an important strategy in the struggle for academic freedom for Palestinians, as well as the struggle against Israeli apartheid and ethnic cleansing. 

Returning to this particular course on early science: if McMaster were to judge that the course needed a co-teacher, in addition to Dr. Symons, nothing in the opposition to McMaster's institutional partnership with Tel Aviv would prevent the faculty from giving Dr. Ratzon full consideration as a candidate for such an appointment.

That said, were Dr. Ratzon as an individual (rather than in her capacity as a Tel Aviv faculty member) to co-teach the course from Tel Aviv or elsewhere in occupied Palestine, then a proper land acknowledgment—which is to say, a proper acknowledgment of the Nakba—would still be in order.  Land acknowledgments shouldn't be a matter of convenience or providing them begrudgingly.  

Say it loudly and say it proudly: BDS for Palestinian Freedom! And academic Freedom for a Free Society!  And kudos to the students of @McMasterSPHR and @McMasterDivest for embracing both. To support the struggle to end McMaster University's institutional partnership with Tel Aviv University, please consider signing this open letter that the McMaster students have prepared.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Response to the Pitzer Administration's "Statement on Ukraine"

On Tuesday, March 15, Pitzer's president and vice-president for academic affairs co-signed a statement of support for, and solidarity with, Ukrainians .  That statement ended with this comment: " We stand with Ukrainians who are demonstrating tremendous bravery, resilience, unity, and courage as they defend their homeland."   What's tragic and disturbing is that this valuable statement against state oppression when Ukrainians are the victims entirely contradicts the administration's opposition to taking a stand against state oppression when Palestinians are the victims.   The recent "Statement on Ukraine" evidences jarring dissonence when read next to  this statement of March 14, 2019 , when the same Pitzer president issued an unprecedented veto of shared governance, in order to block the Pitzer community's taking a stand against Israeli state apartheid and ethnic cleansing.   What follows is my public response to the administration's recent &quo

follow up on "The Debt Ceiling Deal and Progressives"

The composition of the bipartisan Debt Ceiling Panel bodes ill for there being serious cuts in the U.S. military budget as part of any "second phase" deal to reduce the U.S. deficit.  Put simply, the states with large military contractors are fully, if not overly, represented on the Panel.   Of particular note on the Democratic side is Senator Patty Murray of Washington.   Progressive commentators have generally responded favorably to her appointment (and conservative voices have singled it out for criticism), but Boeing is a major employer in Washington (with some 30,000 workers in the state) and its PAC is a major source of campaign funds for Murray.  Almost certainly, for example, the cuts in military spending that would be triggered if the panel reaches no compromise would hit, and perhaps eliminate, the 35 billion dollar contract awarded to Boeing this past February to build roughly 200 new refueling "tanker" aircraft for the military. Murray no doubt will

Occupy Wall Street & "We are the 99%"

One of the few things that seems certain about "Occupy Wall Street" and related protests is that these are the most positive and hopeful political events in the United States at this time.  Beyond that, I find myself curious and uncertain. I do believe, however, that those of us who embrace these protests should be thinking and talking about how to make them better--or more precisely, how it might be possible to build on them to foster a robust social justice movement in our time.  Such a social justice movement would work to build a society--indeed, a world--in which the pursuit of profts and pursuit of economic growth (as measured in GDP or other monetary terms) are subordinated to insuring universal access to high quality health care, high quality education, and food security. In terms of thinking and talking about how to build on the Occupy protests with this goal in mind, I find myself concerned about the slogan, "We are the 99%," that figures prominently a