Skip to main content

The News Corporation Scandal and "the West" in our Time

The News Corporation scandal that is now afflicting the British state provides an opportunity to take stock of "the West" in our time.

Both in the mass media and in academic social science, the West has, for some time, been depicted as the site of governments that are stable and sober, not to mention representative.  One trope in this regard is about how the societies of the West (unlike those elsewhere) are the beneficiaries of a long democratic tradition; and as an antithesis, there is the figure of  the "banana republic."

But let's turn from these imaginaries to the evidence. 

It turns out (I'm shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on at Rick's) that the British government has, for many years, been in thrall to a gang of thugs minimally disguised as journalists.  And then there's Italy, where a home-grown media-moghul has been running the state like a subsidiary of his corporate -- and sexual -- empire.  Back here in the United States, President Obama is both intelligent and ethically serious.  Nonetheless, in most areas he has been unable to pursue serious and responsible policies -- in no small part because of an opposition party that (a) treats Democratic presidents as, by definition, illegitimate and (b) has both an electoral base and a corps of elected officials that believe in a whole array of delusional, know-nothing fantasies (some examples: climate change is not real; the government has enough incoming revenues to pay its bills without borrowing; Obama may well not have been born in the United States; and the Constitution of 1789 was infallible [and please do not read any passages in that document that pertain to the enslavement of human beings]).

Given this evidence of the baleful character of these Western states now,  just why is it that we think that "banana republics" are elsewhere?
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Response to the Pitzer Administration's "Statement on Ukraine"

On Tuesday, March 15, Pitzer's president and vice-president for academic affairs co-signed a statement of support for, and solidarity with, Ukrainians .  That statement ended with this comment: " We stand with Ukrainians who are demonstrating tremendous bravery, resilience, unity, and courage as they defend their homeland."   What's tragic and disturbing is that this valuable statement against state oppression when Ukrainians are the victims entirely contradicts the administration's opposition to taking a stand against state oppression when Palestinians are the victims.   The recent "Statement on Ukraine" evidences jarring dissonence when read next to  this statement of March 14, 2019 , when the same Pitzer president issued an unprecedented veto of shared governance, in order to block the Pitzer community's taking a stand against Israeli state apartheid and ethnic cleansing.   What follows is my public response to the administration's recent &quo
5 comments
Read more

follow up on "The Debt Ceiling Deal and Progressives"

The composition of the bipartisan Debt Ceiling Panel bodes ill for there being serious cuts in the U.S. military budget as part of any "second phase" deal to reduce the U.S. deficit.  Put simply, the states with large military contractors are fully, if not overly, represented on the Panel.   Of particular note on the Democratic side is Senator Patty Murray of Washington.   Progressive commentators have generally responded favorably to her appointment (and conservative voices have singled it out for criticism), but Boeing is a major employer in Washington (with some 30,000 workers in the state) and its PAC is a major source of campaign funds for Murray.  Almost certainly, for example, the cuts in military spending that would be triggered if the panel reaches no compromise would hit, and perhaps eliminate, the 35 billion dollar contract awarded to Boeing this past February to build roughly 200 new refueling "tanker" aircraft for the military. Murray no doubt will
2 comments
Read more

Occupy Wall Street & "We are the 99%"

One of the few things that seems certain about "Occupy Wall Street" and related protests is that these are the most positive and hopeful political events in the United States at this time.  Beyond that, I find myself curious and uncertain. I do believe, however, that those of us who embrace these protests should be thinking and talking about how to make them better--or more precisely, how it might be possible to build on them to foster a robust social justice movement in our time.  Such a social justice movement would work to build a society--indeed, a world--in which the pursuit of profts and pursuit of economic growth (as measured in GDP or other monetary terms) are subordinated to insuring universal access to high quality health care, high quality education, and food security. In terms of thinking and talking about how to build on the Occupy protests with this goal in mind, I find myself concerned about the slogan, "We are the 99%," that figures prominently a
7 comments
Read more